Does the inclusion of non-academic reviewers make any difference for grant impact panels?
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2021 at "Science and Public Policy"
DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scab046
Abstract: Broader impact of scientific research beyond academia has become increasingly important in research evaluation. To evaluate broader impact of research proposals, some funding agencies compose mixed panels that include peer experts and non-academic stakeholders. Whether… read more here.
Keywords: academic reviewers; research; difference; impact ... See more keywords
The prevalence of and factors associated with inclusion of non-English language studies in Campbell systematic reviews: a survey and meta-epidemiological study
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "Systematic Reviews"
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0786-6
Abstract: BackgroundStudies published in languages other than English are often neglected when research teams conduct systematic reviews. Literature on how to deal with non-English studies when conducting reviews have focused on the importance of including such… read more here.
Keywords: english studies; language; systematic reviews; non english ... See more keywords
Inclusion of Non-Conservative Forces in Geometric Integrators with Application to Orbit–Attitude Coupling
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2021 at "Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics"
DOI: 10.2514/1.g005510
Abstract: In this paper, a discretization method for incorporating nonconservative forces in a class of geometric numerical integrators known as variational integrators and Galerkin variational propagators i... read more here.
Keywords: geometric integrators; integrators application; forces geometric; non conservative ... See more keywords