Study of informal reasoning in judicial agents in sexual aggression cases
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Frontiers in Psychology"
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866145
Abstract: Background/Objective Judicial decisions must rest on formal reasoning. Nevertheless, informal reasoning sources (cognitive and motivational biases) were observed in judicial judgment making. Literature has identified sexual aggression cases as the most favorable for informal reasoning.… read more here.
Keywords: judicial agents; aggression cases; attribution; sexual aggression ... See more keywords