The Effects of Militarized Interstate Disputes on Incumbent Voting Across Genders
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "Political Behavior"
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-018-9479-z
Abstract: Gender and politics research argues that men are more hawkish and supportive of militarized confrontations with foreign foes, while women ostensibly prefer more diplomatic approaches. This suggests that, after a militarized confrontation with a foreign… read more here.
Keywords: militarized interstate; hostility mid; disputes incumbent; effects militarized ... See more keywords
Regime Instability, Leader's Affiliation, and Organizational Culture: Why Are Military Dictatorships More Likely to Initiate Militarized Interstate Disputes? An Empirical Analysis, 1975–2006
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Security Studies"
DOI: 10.1080/09636412.2017.1280308
Abstract: ABSTRACT Prior studies find that military dictatorships display a high propensity to initiate militarized interstate disputes (MIDs). Yet, there is little agreement on which feature of military regimes can best explain this behavior. This article… read more here.
Keywords: militarized interstate; affiliation; organizational culture; interstate disputes ... See more keywords
The Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs) Dataset Version 3.0: Logic, Characteristics, and Comparisons to Alternative Datasets
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Journal of Conflict Resolution"
DOI: 10.1177/0022002718784158
Abstract: We introduce the new, substantially updated, and revised version of the Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs) dataset. We discuss the underlying logic of constructing dyadic MIDs and demonstrate that these operations generate significant differences between… read more here.
Keywords: militarized interstate; version; mids dataset; disputes mids ... See more keywords