Interpretive analysis of 85 systematic reviews suggests that narrative syntheses and meta‐analyses are incommensurate in argumentation
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Research Synthesis Methods"
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1231
Abstract: Using Toulmin's argumentation theory, we analysed the texts of systematic reviews in the area of workplace health promotion to explore differences in the modes of reasoning embedded in reports of narrative synthesis as compared with… read more here.
Keywords: meta analyses; modes reasoning; narrative syntheses; analysis ... See more keywords