Comparison of neointimal coverage between durable‐polymer everolimus‐eluting stents and bioresorbable‐polymer everolimus‐eluting stents 1 year after implantation using high‐resolution coronary angioscopy
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions"
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28095
Abstract: We aimed to compare the coronary angioscopic appearance of neointimal coverage (NIC) over durable‐polymer everolimus‐eluting stents (XIENCE‐EES) and bioresorbable‐polymer everolimus‐eluting stents (SYNERGY‐EES) 1 year after implantation. read more here.
Keywords: polymer everolimus; eluting stents; everolimus eluting; neointimal coverage ... See more keywords
Comparison of neointimal coverage between ultrathin biodegradable polymer‐coated sirolimus‐eluting stents and durable polymer‐coated everolimus‐eluting stents: 6 months optical coherence tomography follow‐up from the TAXCO study
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions"
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28833
Abstract: The TAXCO study was designed to compare the degree of neointimal coverage and the prevalence of malapposition at 6 months subsequent to implantation of ultrathin biodegradable polymer‐coated sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES) and durable polymer‐coated everolimus‐eluting stents… read more here.
Keywords: eluting stents; neointimal coverage; polymer coated; ultrathin biodegradable ... See more keywords