A review of high impact journals found that misinterpretation of non-statistically significant results from randomised trials was common.
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Journal of clinical epidemiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.014
Abstract: OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence of poor interpretation practices, such as conflating evidence of absence with absence of evidence and over-emphasis of statistical non-significance in abstract conclusions, in a sample of randomised controlled trials (RCTs)… read more here.
Keywords: high impact; non statistically; statistically significant; evidence ... See more keywords