Investigator bias and the PACE trial
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of Health Psychology"
DOI: 10.1177/1359105317697324
Abstract: The PACE investigators reject Geraghty’s suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for… read more here.
Keywords: pace trial; trial; pace; investigator bias ... See more keywords
PACE trial authors continue to ignore their own null effect
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of Health Psychology"
DOI: 10.1177/1359105317703785
Abstract: Protocols and outcomes for the PACE trial were changed after the start of the trial. These changes made substantial differences, leading to exaggerated claims for the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy and graded exercise therapy… read more here.
Keywords: pace trial; trial; authors continue; continue ignore ... See more keywords
The PACE trial: It’s time to broaden perceptions and move on
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of Health Psychology"
DOI: 10.1177/1359105317703789
Abstract: The continued critiques of the PACE trial highlight how differing beliefs about the causes of chronic fatigue syndrome still influence how scientific studies in this area are accepted and evaluated. Causal beliefs about chronic fatigue… read more here.
Keywords: time broaden; pace trial; pace; trial time ... See more keywords
Defense of the PACE trial is based on argumentation fallacies
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of Health Psychology"
DOI: 10.1177/1359105317712523
Abstract: In defense of the PACE trial, Petrie and Weinman employ a series of misleading or fallacious argumentation techniques, including circularity, blaming the victim, bait and switch, non-sequitur, setting up a straw person, guilt by association,… read more here.
Keywords: pace trial; argumentation; defense pace;
Further commentary on the PACE trial: Biased methods and unreliable outcomes
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of Health Psychology"
DOI: 10.1177/1359105317714486
Abstract: Geraghty in the year 2016, outlines a range of controversies surrounding publication of results from the PACE trial and discusses a freedom of information case brought by a patient refused access to data from the… read more here.
Keywords: pace trial; commentary pace; trial; pace ... See more keywords
Special issue on the PACE Trial
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of Health Psychology"
DOI: 10.1177/1359105317722370
Abstract: We are proud that this issue marks a special contribution by the Journal of Health Psychology to the literature concerning interventions to manage adaptation to chronic health problems. The PACE Trial debate reveals deeply embedded… read more here.
Keywords: special issue; pace trial; trial; psychology ... See more keywords
An independent review of arterial occlusive events (AOEs) in the ponatinib (PON) phase II PACE trial (NCT01207440) in patients (pts) with Ph+ leukemia.
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "Journal of Clinical Oncology"
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.7550
Abstract: 7550Background: The final 5-year analysis of the PACE trial, which evaluated use of PON in pts with refractory chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia, identified a 25% ... read more here.
Keywords: pace trial; independent review; review arterial; pace ... See more keywords