Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23711
Abstract: Design of peer‐review support systems is shaped by the policies that define and govern the process of peer review. An important component of these are policies that deal with anonymity: The rules that govern the… read more here.
Keywords: anonymity policies; peer review; review; understanding supporting ... See more keywords
Rubric development and peer review for predoctoral dental education.
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2023 at "Journal of dental education"
DOI: 10.1002/jdd.13195
Abstract: PURPOSE This article outlines a process and template for developing rubrics that can be shared across predoctoral dental education programs. METHODS The rubrics were developed using a peer-review process for incorporating clinical skills and professional… read more here.
Keywords: peer review; predoctoral dental; dental education;
Evaluating the Impact of Peer Review on the Completeness of Reporting in Imaging Diagnostic Test Accuracy Research
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging"
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28116
Abstract: Despite the nearly ubiquitous reported use of peer review among reputable medical journals, there is limited evidence to support the use of peer review to improve the quality of biomedical research and in particular, imaging… read more here.
Keywords: peer review; diagnostic test; imaging diagnostic; peer ... See more keywords
How Preprint Affects the Publishing Process: Duration of the Peer Review Process between bioRxiv and Journal Papers
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology"
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.660
Abstract: During the COVID‐19 epidemic, the characteristics of rapid sharing of research findings were fully reflected on the bioRxiv platform, which received considerable attention from scholars. bioRxiv currently collaborates with 242 journals, addressing that it can… read more here.
Keywords: duration peer; publishing process; process; peer review ... See more keywords
Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation Part 1: Creation of a Standardized Methodology and Referenceable Database
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of Digital Imaging"
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0004-4
Abstract: Conventional peer review practice is compromised by a number of well-documented biases, which in turn limit standard of care analysis, which is fundamental to determination of medical malpractice. In addition to these intrinsic biases, other… read more here.
Keywords: methodology; peer review; practice; creation standardized ... See more keywords
Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation Part 2: Data-Driven Peer Review Selection and Assignment
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of Digital Imaging"
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0005-3
Abstract: In conventional radiology peer review practice, a small number of exams (routinely 5% of the total volume) is randomly selected, which may significantly underestimate the true error rate within a given radiology practice. An alternative… read more here.
Keywords: data driven; radiology; peer review; review ... See more keywords
The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "Higher Education"
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-020-00626-y
Abstract: The growing literature on gender inequality in academia attests to the challenge that awaits female researchers during their academic careers. However, research has not yet conclusively resolved whether these biases persist during the peer review… read more here.
Keywords: research; research grant; peer review; funding ... See more keywords
Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Scientometrics"
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5
Abstract: To gain insight into the duration and quality of the scientific peer review process, we analyzed data from 3500 review experiences submitted by authors to the SciRev.sc website. Aspects studied are duration of the first… read more here.
Keywords: review process; peer review; review; duration quality ... See more keywords
The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Scientometrics"
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8
Abstract: This article provides a quantitative analysis of peer review as an emerging field of research by revealing patterns and connections between authors, fields and journals from 1950 to 2016. By collecting all available sources from… read more here.
Keywords: field; peer review; research peer;
Reputation or peer review? The role of outliers
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "Scientometrics"
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2826-3
Abstract: We present an agent-based model of paper publication and consumption that allows to study the effect of two different evaluation mechanisms, peer review and reputation, on the quality of the manuscripts accessed by a scientific… read more here.
Keywords: multi disciplinary; peer review; quality; reputation peer ... See more keywords
Improving the peer review process: a proposed market system
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Scientometrics"
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03076-1
Abstract: The current peer review system suffers from two key problems: promotion of an in-crowd whose methods, opinions and innovations it protects; and failure to represent the opinions and interests of non-peer clients. As a result,… read more here.
Keywords: system; market; review process; peer review ... See more keywords