Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "Scientometrics"
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2912-6
Abstract: Editors of scientific journals meet increasing challenges to find peer reviewers. Rewarding reviewers has been proposed as a solution to incentives peer review, and journals have already started to offer different kinds of rewards, particularly… read more here.
Keywords: research; natural experiment; non monetary; monetary rewards ... See more keywords
Peer reviewers equally critique theory, method, and writing, with limited effect on the final content of accepted manuscripts
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Scientometrics"
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04357-y
Abstract: The primary aims of peer review are to detect flaws and deficiencies in the design and interpretation of studies, and ensure the clarity and quality of their presentation. However, it has been questioned whether peer… read more here.
Keywords: review; peer reviewers; reviewers equally; peer review ... See more keywords
Peer Review at JGIM
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "Journal of General Internal Medicine"
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4676-3
Abstract: P eer review is a key component of scientific publication. While imperfect, numerous studies have demonstrated that peer review improves the quality of manuscripts. There have been several interventions to improve peer review quality that… read more here.
Keywords: deputy editors; peer review; peer reviewers; review ... See more keywords
Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "Science and Engineering Ethics"
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9842-6
Abstract: As part of a continuous process to explore the factors that might weaken or corrupt traditional peer review, in this paper, we query the ethics, fairness and validity of the request, by editors, of authors… read more here.
Keywords: suggest peer; submission; authors requested; peer reviewers ... See more keywords
An Homage to Peer Reviewers: Strengthening Our "Bundle of Sticks".
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Journal of the American College of Cardiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.039
Abstract: ![Figure][1] Sticks in a bundle can’t be broken but sticks taken singly can be easily broken. — Fables of Aesop [(1)][2] When I was recently pondering all the individuals who contribute to the output of… read more here.
Keywords: cardiology; bundle sticks; reviewers strengthening; peer reviewers ... See more keywords
Working toward reducing bias in peer review
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2021 at "Journal of Lipid Research"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100124
Abstract: If you are reading this editorial, it is highly likely that you have also read several peer-reviewed publications in the past few weeks. Reading the literature is part of the daily routine for most research… read more here.
Keywords: quality; peer reviewers; peer review; working toward ... See more keywords
Peer reviewers unmasked: largest global survey reveals trends
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "Nature"
DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-06602-y
Abstract: Scientists in emerging economies respond fastest to peer review invitations, but are invited least. Scientists in emerging economies respond fastest to peer review invitations, but are invited least. read more here.
Keywords: largest global; unmasked largest; survey reveals; global survey ... See more keywords
Thousands of grant peer reviewers share concerns in global survey.
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Nature"
DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03105-2
Abstract: Peer review process helps funders make decisions, but researchers say it is time-consuming and lacks transparency. Peer review process helps funders make decisions, but researchers say it is time-consuming and lacks transparency. read more here.
Keywords: thousands grant; grant peer; reviewers share; peer reviewers ... See more keywords
Recognizing peer reviewers
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Nature Nanotechnology"
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-019-0413-2
Abstract: Nature Nanotechnology has started publicly acknowledging reviewers of published papers. read more here.
Keywords: nanotechnology; peer reviewers; recognizing peer;
The consistency of peer-reviewers and the process of commensuration: A comment on Bolek et al. (2022).
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Accountability in research"
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2135992
Abstract: This letter to the editor briefly comments on an article published in Accountability in Research by Bolek et al. (2022), titled "The consistency of peer-reviewers: Assessment of separate parts of the manuscripts vs final recommendations".… read more here.
Keywords: bolek 2022; peer reviewers; consistency peer;
Thank You to Our 2021 Peer Reviewers
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Reviews of Geophysics"
DOI: 10.1097/jpa.0000000000000404
Abstract: Reviews of Geophysics is the top‐rated journal in Geochemistry and Geophysics (ISI Web of Knowledge category) reflecting the many excellent contributions we received. It is an important milestone achieved with the reviewers' investment of time… read more here.
Keywords: thank 2021; geochemistry; 2021 peer; peer reviewers ... See more keywords