Reply to the comments of Dr Fayssoil
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing"
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00427-4
Abstract: We thank Dr Fayssoil for his interest in our recently published study on diaphragm evaluation using echo. While we acknowledge the clinical relevance of the three questions raised, this study was not designed, nor was… read more here.
Keywords: reply comments; diaphragmatic function; chest tubes; comments fayssoil ... See more keywords
Reply to comments on: Mao et al. (2018) “Bibliometric analysis of insights into soil remediation” Journal of Soils and Sediments, 18(7):2520–2534
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Journal of Soils and Sediments"
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-019-02323-5
Abstract: Indeed, different databases purchased by different institutes or schools will lead to varying searching results. Moreover, the data in Web of Science is often updated; for example, the results obtained today may be different from… read more here.
Keywords: reply comments; soils sediments; remediation; journal soils ... See more keywords
A short reply to the comments of Fletcher's short communication published in this issue
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.113861
Abstract: Abstract The aim of any scientific discussion is to get closer to the truth and remove any obstruction impeding the progress of science. It is with this intention in mind that I endeavour to write… read more here.
Keywords: fletcher short; reply comments; short communication; short reply ... See more keywords
Reply to comments on “Uncertainty and bias in electronic tide gauge records: Evidence from collocated sensors” by Pytharouli S., Chaikalis S. and Stiros S.C., Measurement 125: 496–508, 2018
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "Measurement"
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107658
Abstract: Abstract This is a Reply to Comments by Arup et al. on the paper by Pytharouli et al. (2018), recently published in Measurement. Arup et al. (thereafter “Comment”), although they endorsed the conclusions of our… read more here.
Keywords: collocated sensors; reply comments; uncertainty bias; measurement ... See more keywords
Comments on “Reply to comments on study of density, dynamic viscosity, excess property and intermolecular interplay studies for 1,4-butanediol + dimethyl sulfoxide binary mixture”
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Journal of Molecular Liquids"
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112089
Abstract: Abstract A polemic is given regarding the volumetric properties reported in the authors' reply to an earlier commentary. The recalculated partial molar volumes of the individual mixture components, given in the authors' reply, are found… read more here.
Keywords: density dynamic; reply comments; study density; comments reply ... See more keywords
Reply to comments on “Chronology and environmental context of the early prehistoric peopling of Kamchatka, the Russian north far east (Ponkratova, I. Yu., Chlachula, J., Clausen. I, Quaternary Science Reviews 252 (2021), by Yaroslav V. Kuzmin”
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2021 at "Quaternary Science Reviews"
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107049
Abstract: Abstract Here, we respond to the comments of Y. Kuzmin on the conclusions of our investigations at the multi-layered Ushki V site, central Kamchatka, published in the paper of I. Yu. Ponkratova and others (QSR,… read more here.
Keywords: reply comments; quaternary science; comments chronology; chronology environmental ... See more keywords
Reply to comments on ``Giant dielectric response in (Nb + Zn) co-doped strontium titanate ceramics tailored by atmosphere''
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "Scripta Materialia"
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.04.002
Abstract: Abstract This letter replies to the comments by Tkach et al. on our previous publication about the issues of ZnO volatilization, Ti3+ content and lattice constant etc. In this reply, we present a detailed discussion… read more here.
Keywords: reply comments; comments giant; dielectric response; giant dielectric ... See more keywords
Reply to Comments on ‘Feynman’s handwritten notes on electromagnetism and the idea of introducing potentials before fields’
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "European Journal of Physics"
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6404/aba9f1
Abstract: We reply to some comments made by Davis (2020 Eur. J. Phys. 40 018001) on our paper (2020 Eur. J. Phys. 41 035202), by arguing that Davis’s assertions are unsupported in some cases and are… read more here.
Keywords: electromagnetism; reply comments; feynman handwritten; comments feynman ... See more keywords
Reply to Comments on “A Three-Section Dual-Band Transformer for Frequency-Dependent Complex Load Impedance”
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters"
DOI: 10.1109/lmwc.2019.2948458
Abstract: The author thanks Dr. R. Sinha very much for providing detailed design equations for the proposed dual-band impedance transformer in [1] . Note that the analytical solutions for Z 1 are very necessary, which are… read more here.
Keywords: reply comments; dual band; transformer; comments three ... See more keywords
Reply to Comments by Ortiz-Conde et al.
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices"
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2018.2859306
Abstract: In this response, we show that the paper by Kim et al. by our group has a different research purpose and uses different modeling processes, which was not described in the previous work by Ortiz-Conde… read more here.
Keywords: reply comments; comments ortiz; ortiz conde; previous work ... See more keywords
Authors’ Reply to “Comments on ‘An Analytical Surface Potential Model Accounting for the Dual-Modulation Effects in Tunnel FETs”’
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices"
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2020.2996971
Abstract: We thank Prof. Shaker [1] for his interest in the above article [2] and his positive statement in the Comments. Regarding the errors raised by Prof. Shaker, the following are our replies. read more here.
Keywords: potential model; comments analytical; reply comments; surface potential ... See more keywords