Why Public Comments Matter: The Case of the National Institutes of Health Policy on Single Institutional Review Board Review of Multicenter Studies
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "Academic Medicine"
DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000002206
Abstract: Purpose In 2014, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) requested public comments on a draft policy requiring NIH-funded, U.S.-based investigators to use a single institutional review board (sIRB) for ethical review of multicenter studies. The… read more here.
Keywords: policy; review board; institutional review; public comments ... See more keywords
Maneuvering the Institutional Review Board Process
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing"
DOI: 10.1097/dcc.0000000000000506
Abstract: Supplemental digital content is available in the text. Institutional review boards (IRBs) exist to protect the rights and welfare of research participants. Critical care nurses and researchers may interface with IRBs directly or indirectly. Having… read more here.
Keywords: institutional review; review; review board; board process ... See more keywords
Site Variability in Regulatory Oversight for an International Study of Pediatric Sepsis
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "Pediatric Critical Care Medicine"
DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000001455
Abstract: Objectives: Duplicative institutional review board/research ethics committee review for multicenter studies may impose administrative burdens and inefficiencies affecting study implementation and quality. Understanding variability in site-specific institutional review board/research ethics committee assessment and barriers to… read more here.
Keywords: research; review board; institutional review; study ... See more keywords
Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "ESMO Open"
DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000469
Abstract: Background The increasing frequency and complexity of cancer genomic profiling represents a challenge for the oncology community. Results from next-generation sequencing–based clinical tests require expert review to determine their clinical relevance and to ensure patients… read more here.
Keywords: review board; genomics review; pathology; 895 patients ... See more keywords
Trends in the number and the quality of trial protocols involving children submitted to a French Institutional Review Board
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "BMC Medical Research Methodology"
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0395-4
Abstract: BackgroundThere is a great need for high quality clinical research for children. The European Pediatric Regulation aimed to improve the quality of clinical trials in order to increase the availability of treatments for children. The… read more here.
Keywords: number; quality; review board; institutional review ... See more keywords
Pediatric specific challenges of the single institutional review board mandate
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Trials"
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06141-y
Abstract: Background The Common Rule Revision (CRR) mandates a single institutional review board (IRB) for all US federally funded nonexempt multisite human participant research. While the CRR aims to improve research efficiency, its success in pediatric… read more here.
Keywords: review board; institutional review; single institutional; research ... See more keywords
Organization and Development of Arthur Andersen & Co.’s Public Review Board - The Minow Years, 1974-1983
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Accounting Horizons"
DOI: 10.2308/horizons-2021-074
Abstract: This is a historical account of first nine years of Arthur Andersen & Co.’s Public Review Board (PRB), from 1974 to 1983. This period coincides with the term of Chair Newton N. Minow. The paper… read more here.
Keywords: andersen public; 1974 1983; arthur andersen; review board ... See more keywords