Improving the pull requests review process using learning-to-rank algorithms
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Empirical Software Engineering"
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-019-09696-8
Abstract: Collaborative software development platforms (such as GitHub and GitLab) have become increasingly popular as they have attracted thousands of external contributors to contribute to open source projects. The external contributors may submit their contributions via… read more here.
Keywords: pull; learning rank; pull requests; review process ... See more keywords
Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Scientometrics"
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5
Abstract: To gain insight into the duration and quality of the scientific peer review process, we analyzed data from 3500 review experiences submitted by authors to the SciRev.sc website. Aspects studied are duration of the first… read more here.
Keywords: review process; peer review; review; duration quality ... See more keywords
Improving the peer review process: a proposed market system
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Scientometrics"
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03076-1
Abstract: The current peer review system suffers from two key problems: promotion of an in-crowd whose methods, opinions and innovations it protects; and failure to represent the opinions and interests of non-peer clients. As a result,… read more here.
Keywords: system; market; review process; peer review ... See more keywords
Rolling Reviews During COVID-19: The European Union Experience in a Global Context
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2022 at "Clinical Therapeutics"
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.01.001
Abstract: Purpose Many regulators offered new ways of working to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic, and the rolling review procedure is an important and successful example. In rolling reviews, data are submitted and reviewed as they… read more here.
Keywords: review; review process; rolling reviews; rolling review ... See more keywords
A descriptive research: Exclusion from submitted clinical data package in the review process of new drug approval due to GCP violation in Japan
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications"
DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100416
Abstract: Introduction In Japan, the PMDA conducted inspections based on GCP in the review process of the submission of NDAs or sNDAs. In this descriptive study, we examined in detail the contents of exclusion data from… read more here.
Keywords: submitted clinical; exclusion; ndas sndas; review process ... See more keywords
Using a multisite and multi-health system pharmacy resident program model for care documentation quality improvement.
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA"
DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.07.013
Abstract: OBJECTIVES To implement and evaluate a pharmacy resident documentation peer review process. SETTING The University of Minnesota Postgraduate Year One Pharmacy Residency Program is a multisite program with 25 residents across 16 different health care… read more here.
Keywords: care; documentation; process; peer review ... See more keywords
How fast is the peer-review process for orthopaedic publications related to the Covid-19 pandemic?
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.007
Abstract: Purpose This study's primary objective is to evaluate the time spent in the peer-review process for orthopaedic publications related to the Covid-19 pandemic. The secondary objective is to evaluate the countries' and journals' contributions in… read more here.
Keywords: publications related; review process; peer review; process ... See more keywords
Quality standards and training are important in the peer review process, but what about engagement?
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2020 at "Industrial and Organizational Psychology"
DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.10
Abstract: Many argue that the peer review is broken—but it should not be. The focal article by Kohler et al. (2020) comes at a time when many researchers and some editors are claiming the peer review… read more here.
Keywords: review process; peer review; quality; review ... See more keywords
Better Science by Beating Back Bias.
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Environmental science & technology"
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00810
Abstract: T human mind takes shortcuts by using past experiences to fill in missing information. This special talent helped our forebears avoid unfamiliar dangers and facilitated the development of modern civilization. Today, it allows us to… read more here.
Keywords: implicit bias; review process; process; agu ... See more keywords
Negotiating the review process: a CIA guide to intelligence analysis, 1970
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "Intelligence and National Security"
DOI: 10.1080/02684527.2018.1470072
Abstract: Abstract The literature on intelligence analysis contains many references to the ‘review process’, the mechanism by which analysts’ drafts are converted into corporate products. Analysts whose drafts consistently navigate the process quickly and smoothly are… read more here.
Keywords: intelligence; intelligence analysis; analysis; guide ... See more keywords
Bias in the Peer Review Process: Can We Do Better?
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Obstetrics and gynecology"
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003260
Abstract: Peer review is the major method used by the scientific community to evaluate manuscripts and decide what is suitable for publication. However, this process in its current design is not bulletproof and is prone to… read more here.
Keywords: review; peer review; bias peer; review process ... See more keywords