Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 2
Published in 2023 at "JAMA Network Open"
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1671
Abstract: This systematic review assesses the clinical applicability and reporting quality of available artificial intelligence models in psychiatry. read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 1
Published in 2020 at "Research synthesis methods"
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1398
Abstract: BACKGROUND Evidence from new health technologies is growing, along with demands for evidence to inform policy decisions, creating challenges in completing health technology assessments (HTAs)/systematic reviews (SRs) in a timely manner. Software can decrease the… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2024 at "Intensive Care Medicine"
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07629-8
Abstract: Despite its promise to enhance patient outcomes and support clinical decision making, clinical use of artificial intelligence (AI) models at the bedside remains limited. Translation of advancements in AI research into tangible clinical benefits is… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 1
Published in 2019 at "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology"
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-02926-y
Abstract: Cancer patients frequently use extracts from European mistletoe (Viscum album L.) as a complementary treatment (Zänker and Kaveri 2015). Freuding et al. aimed at reviewing the effects of mistletoe extracts in cancer therapy on overall… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2018 at "Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing"
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0233-1
Abstract: The prevention and treatment of hypothermia is an important part of routine anesthesia care. Avoidance of perioperative hypothermia was introduced as a quality metric in 2010. We sought to assess the integrity of the perioperative… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2018 at "Annals of epidemiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.06.006
Abstract: PURPOSE In the context of Cochrane systematic reviews/meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, risk of bias (RoB) is assessed using categorical indicators (low, unclear, or high RoB). This study sought to evaluate the indicators of the… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2017 at "European journal of radiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.003
Abstract: Background Postmortem imaging has been used for more than a century as a complement to medico-legal autopsies. The technique has also emerged as a possible alternative to compensate for the continuous decline in the number… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 1
Published in 2020 at "International Journal of Infectious Diseases"
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1470
Abstract: Objectives We critically evaluated the quality of evidence and quality of harms reporting in clincal trials that recently evaluated the effectiveness of HCQ/CQ in COVID-19. Study Design and Setting Scientific databases were systematically searched to… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 1
Published in 2018 at "International journal of nursing studies"
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.015
Abstract: OBJECTIVES To investigate the efficacy of interventions for the prevention and treatment of low back pain in nurses. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES The review was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42015026941) and followed the… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 1
Published in 2017 at "Journal of clinical epidemiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.011
Abstract: OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence of registered trials and to evaluate the risk of bias between registered and unregistered clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING The Cochrane Gynecology and Fertility Group's specialized register was searched… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2017 at "Journal of clinical epidemiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.023
Abstract: OBJECTIVES The objective of the study was to develop and validate an adequate tool to evaluate the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews assessing drug adverse events. STUDY DESIGN… read more here.