Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2020 at "Human Mutation"
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23996
Abstract: As comprehensive sequencing technologies gain widespread use, questions about so‐called secondary findings (SF) require urgent consideration. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has recommended to report SF in 59 genes (ACMG SF v2.0)… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2020 at "Journal of Genetic Counseling"
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1350
Abstract: Exome/genome sequencing (ES/GS) is increasingly becoming routine in clinical genetic diagnosis, yet issues regarding how to disclose and manage secondary findings (SFs) remain to be addressed, and limited evidence is available on patients’ preferences. We… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2020 at "Prenatal Diagnosis"
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5670
Abstract: Genome sequencing is increasingly being used to aid genetic diagnosis in fetuses with structural abnormalities detected on ultrasound examination. However, with clinical exome and genome sequencing, there is potential for the recognition and reporting of… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2021 at "Prenatal diagnosis"
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5973
Abstract: OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine the frequency of accepting secondary findings in families underoing exome sequencing in prenatal and pediatric settings. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of prospectively enrolled patients undergoing trio exome sequencing… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 1
Published in 2022 at "Prenatal Diagnosis"
DOI: 10.1002/pd.6097
Abstract: As the use of genomic sequencing (GS) in the prenatal setting becomes more widespread, laboratories and clinicians will be tasked with making decisions about whether to offer incidental and secondary findings to expectant parents and,… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2021 at "Journal of clinical immunology"
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-021-01107-2
Abstract: PURPOSE Newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is based on the detection of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs). TRECs are a sensitive biomarker for T-cell lymphopenia, but not specific for SCID. This creates… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2019 at "European journal of medical genetics"
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103711
Abstract: Access to active search for actionable secondary findings (SF) in diagnostic practice is a major psychological and ethical issue for genomic medicine. In this study, we analyzed the preferences of patients and their families regarding… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2018 at "Genetics in Medicine"
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.243
Abstract: PurposeSecondary findings from genomic sequencing are becoming more common. We compared how health-care providers with and without specialized genetics training anticipated responding to different types of secondary findings.MethodsProviders with genomic sequencing experience reviewed five secondary-findings… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 1
Published in 2017 at "Genetics in Medicine"
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.25
Abstract: To the Editor: We appreciate the thoughtful feedback from Dr Biesecker1 regarding the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Secondary Findings v2.0 article.2 Our efforts as the Secondary Findings Maintenance Working Group rest… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 1
Published in 2017 at "Genetics in Medicine"
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.27
Abstract: To the Editor: The authors of the recent American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics secondary findings recommendations1 are to be commended for the thoughtful and helpful update they have provided to the community. As… read more here.
Sign Up to like & get recommendations! 0
Published in 2019 at "European Journal of Human Genetics"
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0438-x
Abstract: Secondary findings (SF) differ from incidental findings as they are actively sought and systematically evaluated using a list of genes selected based on guidelines developed by professional societies in various jurisdictions. Despite some authors stating… read more here.