An observational study of missing data enquiry from randomised trial authors showed a poor response.
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2019 at "Journal of clinical epidemiology"
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.014
Abstract: BACKGROUND The quality of evidence from a meta-analysis might be affected by poor or inadequate reporting of individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The results of data request from authors has not been investigated to date.… read more here.
Keywords: missing data; response rate; response; trial authors ... See more keywords
Questions regarding the CONCERN trial – Authors' reply
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2018 at "The Lancet"
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32428-5
Abstract: 1 Chan FKL, Ching JYL, Tse YK, et al. Gastrointestinal safety of celecoxib versus naproxen in patients with cardiothrombotic diseases and arthritis after upper gastrointestinal bleeding (CONCERN): an industry-independent, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trial. Lancet 2017;… read more here.
Keywords: trial; regarding concern; questions regarding; concern ... See more keywords
PACE trial authors continue to ignore their own null effect
Sign Up to like & getrecommendations! Published in 2017 at "Journal of Health Psychology"
DOI: 10.1177/1359105317703785
Abstract: Protocols and outcomes for the PACE trial were changed after the start of the trial. These changes made substantial differences, leading to exaggerated claims for the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy and graded exercise therapy… read more here.
Keywords: pace trial; trial; authors continue; continue ignore ... See more keywords